The Collapse of American Moral Values

Posted in Safar al-Hawali on July 17, 2008 by Abu Sabaya

“…The discussion regarding values can become deep and philosophical, and the reader doesn’t need this. So, let us instead approach it from the standpoint of experience and historical application.

The United States of America was founded on the paired values of extreme religiosity and sheer self-centered opportunism. The religious values were concentrated in certain groups of Americans living in certain states, and the opportunistic values were likewise concentrated in certain groups and states. The balance between the two was effectively maintained until the first World War, which is when America abandoned its neutrality and emerged from seclusion. This is where its policies began gradually separating from traditional values, creating the huge gap between the two that exists today.

However, the American people in their conscience remained zealously attached to their values up until the current Information Revolution. Since intellectuals are usually the first people to become aware of the collapse of values in a society, a certain pessimism began appearing over half a century ago in various fictional writings, and then in books of philosophical political commentary. The assassination of Kennedy was a decisive sign of the success of the hidden influence of the arms-dealers. This is where stiff criticism of the government began, and people began describing it as a military empire. In What Uncle Sam Really Wants,’ Noam Chomsky clarified how American policy was quite detached from moral values in a brief perceptive way, where he basically said that any success or attempt to become free from serving American interests in any country in the world is always confronted, even if this were to lead to the use of military force. He also showed that more than half of the world’s nations served as theaters in which this policy was implemented, with the constant claim being the ’struggle against Communism.’ After the collapse of Communism, Islam immediately took its place, and the slogan was changed to ‘war against terrorism,’ and its alliance with Zionism became clearly exposed.

Along with this came a massive collapse in the structure of moral values in the family, as well as in people’s general dealings with each other. This started all the way at the top with the fatherly “values president” as he was called, continuing down to the corrupt priest, all the way down to the current generation that has opened its eyes to the Information Revolution, such that 90% of the total websites accessed by Americans on the Internet are permissive sites.

Basically, we can say that American policy is deteriorating at the foot of the mountain when it comes to values, and American society is frighteningly progressing towards collapse due to this. If the bitterest enemies of America were to spend billions of dollars to ruin its image and reputation, they would have been unable to ruin the world’s view of it to the same extent that it has done itself…”

Original Arabic: http://www.alhawali.com/index.cfm?method=home.SubContent&contentID=167

When the Ummah Deviated from the Actions of the Heart

Posted in Safar al-Hawali on July 17, 2008 by Abu Sabaya

“…The Companions and the righteous predecessors understood the Book of Allah and implemented it in knowledge and action, and they knew the importance of the actions of the heart such as sincerity, certainty, truthfulness, love, etc. As a result, they became true manifestations of complete servitude to Allah, and they knew that لا إله إلا الله was not just a phrase spoken on the tongue. They knew that the person - if his heart submits and becomes subdued and humble - must carry out certain deeds, and that his limbs must also become subdued. This is why their lives became a living manifestation of these realities of faith that their hearts were experiencing, may Allah be Pleased with them and they with Him.

What happened in the later years to some of Ahl as-Sunnah wal-Jama’ah - and we are not talking about those who opposed them - is that they were afflicted with what others were afflicted with to a certain degree. They became afflicted with weakness, and their understanding became restricted and limited in their minds, and the whole concept of the Religion to them became nothing more than basic rituals, and the testimony that none was worthy of worship except Allah became a mere statement.

So, Ahl as-Sunnah no longer have the same strength and high esteem that they had during these previous three centuries or generations, because when the Prophet (صلى الله عليه و سلم) said: “The best people are my generation, followed by those who come after them, followed by those who come after them,” this did not mean that those who came after these three generations were innovators or followers of desires. Rather, they were from the same group. However, they were much less in number, and they had weakness. While their characteristics did not expel them from the circle of Ahl as-Sunnah, they did bring them down from the high degree occupied by the first three virtuous generations who were the the ultimate manifestations of action, faith, and belief in this religion.

This is proven by the fact that the scholars who understood the reality of the actions of the heart and spoke about them were met with a bit of suspicion. Some even reprimanded them, and I am not talking about the people of innovation. Rather, some of Ahl as-Sunnah reacted as if these people were coming with something new, or as if this scholar was coming with something that had never been seen before, or that he at least was coming with something that they had not learned from their own scholars. For example, look to how suspicious they were of what was brought by Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah or Muhammad bin ‘Abd al-Wahhab. Some of the people were good and righteous, and did not like innovations or dabble in them, and they were around during and before the call of Muhammad bin ‘Abd al-Wahhab. Despite this, they never called to what he called to, and they never revived what he revived because they were never exposed to what he was exposed to. However, along with Ibn Taymiyyah and Ahmad before him, he understood and knew that this belief consists of speech and action, and that if the heart is alive and moving, then the limbs must also move with life. So, the issue is not one of simple repetition where we just sit together and repeat our beliefs regarding Allah’s Names and Attributes, predestination, the Hereafter, etc., and that we each memorize all of this and then go home as guided people thinking we have attained blessing, knowledge, and virtue. There is no doubt that such a person really has attained much good, knowledge, and virtue thanks to Allah, and this is something great. However, the issue is much greater than this. These leading scholars learned just like the Prophet used to teach his Companions their faith before he would teach them the Qur’an.

Those who inherited this knowledge knew that it must be transformed into action, da’wah, struggle, and patience. Because of this, they moved forth in their lives. So, there was no way that Imam Ahmad would go along silently with the Ummah while it was deviating from the correct belief to a corrupt one even if he was harmed, beaten, whipped, or had everything else that you know of happen to him in the process.

Likewise, when Ibn Taymiyyah wanted to move this Ummah to Jihad, he was in the foremost ranks of the army. So, he fought the tawaghit of the Tatars, and he went in person to address them with the strongest of words. As for the Batinis, he would take his students with him and struggle against them by way of debate, and he would call the Muslims to fight the Crusaders. This is the true life in which the life and actions of the limbs come together with the life and actions of the heart. However, not every nation possesses this, and this is where Ahl as-Sunnah became deficient, and this was the situation upon the onset of the call of Muhammad bin ‘Abd al-Wahhab.

Today, we live according to this belief and upon the remnants of this call, thanks to Allah, and we find within ourselves this clear weakness that shows that we have not implemented the actions of the heart as they should be. Even if we do generally avoid the innovators, the issue is bigger than just avoiding innovators. Rather, we should become stronger in our faith, certainty, sincerity, and da’wah. How many of the Muslims and students of knowledge do not even know the conditions of لا إله إلا الله, which are knowledge, sincerity, certainty, truthfulness, acceptance, love, and submission? If we go back to the actions of the heart that I was talking about, we will see that لا إله إلا الله necessitates these conditions which are the very basics of faith…This is enough of a sign that the Ummah has this clear shortcoming and deficiency…”

Original Arabic: http://www.alhawali.com/index.cfm?method=home.SubContent&contentID=769

Knowledge and Hydrocephalus

Posted in 'Abdullah 'Azzam on July 10, 2008 by Abu Sabaya

“…Allah’s way of building the human soul is to develop it gradually, just like a building. You build a building floor by floor, placing one brick over the other, etc. until the human soul is fully built.

The human soul cannot be built overnight, it cannot be built overnight. It needs a long time to be built…build it gradually, just like the body grows gradually. When a person is born, he is half a meter tall, for example. One day, he will be seven years old, and one day he will be seventy-five years old. He will grow from being a meter tall to being a meter and a quarter tall, etc. When he gets to be twenty years old, he will be between 170 to 175 centimeters tall.

The human soul is exactly like this when it comes to gradually growing in the religion. This is why the Lord of Honor would reveal the Qur’an one, two, or three verses at a time and would require them to act upon those verses. The Companions of the Messenger of Allah would take one, two, or three verses - never more than ten at a time - and then go act on them. They would then come back, learn some more, and go act on what they learned. As Ibn Mas’ud said: “We learned knowledge and action with the Qur’an.”

Therefore, it is very dangerous for you to have a lot of knowledge while having only a modest level of action. The one who hears you thinks to himself ‘Ma Sha’ Allah!’ He hears you talking about this verse from the Qur’an, this hadith, the hadith being authentic, the hadith being weak, ‘Aqidah, Islamic history, the Khulafa’, ‘Umar said this, Abu Bakr said that - may Allah be Pleased with them all. However, you are ten centimeters when it comes to action, and when it comes to knowledge, you are over three meters. There is no balance! This is a disease. Having a lot of knowledge without action is a disease just like having a lot of action without knowledge.

There is a disease in the medical field known as hydrocephalus. It is when someone’s head becomes so enlarged that his body is unable to carry it. I saw someone with his head like this, his body was thin, and his knees were unable to support his head. It could not! This is what many people look like: they learn a lot of knowledge - they memorize, they do not learn - they memorize. However, his head is poised like this while his body and limbs cannot support it. The size of a person’s head must be consistent with the size of his body. Otherwise, he will be considered diseased if any part of his body grows larger while the rest of his body doesn’t grow. If the medicine he takes all goes to one part of his body - for example, it all goes to his nose - his nose will become bigger than the rest of his head, and he will be deformed!

So, the Religion of Allah is a gradual divine method of developing the human soul just like this. Just like a medicine dropper administers the medicine gradually, they would take two verses or two ahadith, and they would go act upon them just like this…”

['at-Tarbiyah al-Jihadiyyah wal-Bina''; 3/182-183]

When the Shar’i Cure Doesn’t Work!

Posted in al-'Uthaymin, al-Qurtubi on July 8, 2008 by Abu Sabaya

Khawlah bint Hakim narrated that Allah’s Messenger (صلى الله عليه و سلم) said: “Whoever arrives somewhere and says: ‘I seek refuge with Allah’s complete Words from the evil He has Created (أعوذ بكلمات الله التامات من شر ما خلق),’ nothing will harm until he leaves that place.”

This was reported by Muslim (2708).

In ‘Taysir al-’Aziz al-Hamid’ (p. 146), Sulayman bin ‘Abdillah relates that al-Qurtubi commented on this by saying:

“And this is true and real, and I believe in it due to the textual proof as well as my own experience. Since I heard this narration, I would constantly act upon it and nothing was able to harm me until I left it. One night, I was stung by a scorpion in al-Mahdiyyah (a province in Tunisia). So, I thought to myself until I realized that I had forgotten to seek refuge using these words.”

In ‘al-Qawl al-Mufid’ (1/155), Ibn al-’Uthaymin commented on this hadith:

“This protection is from all human and jinni devils - whether they are visible or invisible - until the person leaves that place. And there is no way that what is described in this narration will not take place, as these are the words of the truthful one who is believed (i.e. the Messenger of Allah)! However, if what is mentioned in this narration does not take place, it is because of a preventative factor and not because of a deficiency in the method itself or the narration. This also applies to anything that the Prophet (صلى الله عليه و سلم) mentioned as a Shar’i method in which the desired outcome is not achieved. So, this is not because of a fault in the method, and is rather because of the presence of an obstacle that is blocking the desired outcome.

For example, reciting ‘al-Fatihah’ for a sick person is a form of healing. Some people recite it and find that the sick person is not healed. This is not because of a deficiency in this method, and is instead because there is something present that is preventing this method from bringing about its desired effect. Another example is mentioning Allah before having sexual intercourse in order to prevent Satan from harming the future child. Some people will mention Allah and find that Satan still ends up harming the child due to something that is preventing this effect from being achieved.

So, you should check yourself to figure out what the obstacle is so that you can remove it and experience the effect of the method.”

Worship of Ease vs. Worship of Difficulty

Posted in Ibn al-Qayyim on July 7, 2008 by Abu Sabaya

“…Indeed, Allah has tasked His slaves with worship in difficult conditions just as He has in conditions of ease. He has tasked them with worship in what they dislike just as He has tasked them with worship in what they love. Most people are given the chance to worship in regards to what they love. However, the true distinguishing factor is when one worships during conditions that he dislikes, as this is what makes a person degrees and degrees above others, and this is what determines his level with Allah.

So, making ablution with cold water in extremely hot weather is worship, and kissing your beautiful wife that you love is worship, and spending money on her, the children, and yourself is worship. This same ablution with cold water in extremely cold weather is also worship, and abandoning a very tempting sin when there is no fear of anyone finding out is also worship, and spending your money in times of poverty is also worship.

However, there is a huge difference between the two sets of worship!

So, the one who is a slave of Allah in both types of conditions, fulfilling His rights in what he likes and dislikes, is the one who this verse applies to: {“Is Allah not sufficient for His slave?”} [az-Zumar; 25] and in another qira’ah: {“…for His slaves?”} They both carry the same meaning, as the singular form of the word is simply an ascription to the generality of it, and is referring to all of the slaves of Allah.

The complete sufficiency that is referred to in this verse comes with the complete servitude and worship displayed by the slave, and incomplete sufficiency comes with incomplete servitude. So, whoever finds himself with good should praise Allah, and whoever finds himself with anything else should only blame himself…”

['al-Wabil as-Sayyib'; p. 22-23]

A Touching Display of Love

Posted in The Words of the Salaf on July 5, 2008 by Abu Sabaya

In the biographical sketch of Muhammad al-Arghiani, one finds a touching display of love and awe for the words of Allah’s Messenger:

“He is the memorizer, the genius, the traveler, the ascetic, the example, Muhammad bin al-Musayyab bin Ishaq al-Arghiani.

He was born in the year 223, and he died in the year 315. May Allah have Mercy upon him.

Abu ‘Abdullah al-Hakim said: “He was one who exerted himself in worship, and he was one who traveled widely to learn Hadith. He was a very truthful and devout person. I heard many of our scholars recalling that he said: “I do not know of a single pulpit from the pulpits of Islam that is left that I have not entered to learn Hadith.”

And Abu ‘Ali an-Naysaburi said: “Muhammad bin al-Musayyab al-Arghiani would walk around in Egypt with 100,000 ahadith in his pocket.” So, it was asked of Abu ‘Ali: “How was this possible?” He replied: “Each packet of ahadith was small and written in very small handwriting, and each packet contained a thousand of them, and he would carry a hundred of these packets with him. This became a famous trait of his.

And when he would read a hadith and would get to the part where he would say ‘The Messenger of Allah - صلى الله عليه و سلم - said,’ he would begin to weep to the point that we would have to calm him down! He even became blind because of how much he would weep!

May Allah be Pleased with him.”"

['Tadhkirat al-Huffadh'; 2/789]

Between the Superiority of the Past and the Inferiority Complex of Today

Posted in Muhammad Qutb on July 4, 2008 by Abu Sabaya

“…The Islamic world today is experiencing one of the worst periods in its existence. It would be appropriate to refer to this period as the period of wilderness.

The Islamic world has experienced many crises before - many disasters, in fact. During these periods, the Muslims would lose their positions of power on Earth, or they would lose their sense of safety and security, or they would lose their homes and wealth. However, despite all of this, they never experienced anything as difficult or bitter in their entire history as they are experiencing today.

The crisis of apostasy, for example, was no doubt a difficult one to deal with. It was on the verge of causing the new Islamic state to collapse and become extinct in its prime. However, the one who observed the pattern of Allah would never have had any doubt that victory would be for the Islamic state and not for the apostates scattered here or there throughout the Arabian Peninsula. This is because the faith of the Muslims in the truth that they had adopted and that had deepened their relationship with their Lord and their devotion to His Religion was much stronger than the faith of the apostates in their own falsehood that they were fighting for, and this was due to the absence of any true substance to their position other than mere doubts and desires! As for the Companions’ reluctance and their consulting of Abu Bakr in regards to fighting them, this was not out of any doubt they harbored that His Religion would be given victory. Rather, their consulting of Abu Bakr was to convince him to spend enough time to gather the necessary forces to sustain such a battle. However, the solid faith of Abu Bakr, his deep confidence in the promise of Allah to establish this religion on Earth, his natural disdain at leaving those who had rebelled against the commands of Allah without inflicting the punishment that Allah had ordered him to bring upon them - all of this played its part in the hearts of the Companions. So, they stood united behind Abu Bakr, and Allah gave victory to His Religion as He had promised.

And the fitnah of ‘Uthman’s killing and all the wars between ‘Ali and Mu’awiyah that followed was a difficult crisis that afflicted the Muslims and the Islamic state while it was still in its early years and still had enemies all around it. However, the one who observed the sequence of events in those days did not have any doubt as to how the crisis would end. The dispute - regardless of how deep and dividing it was between the ranks of the Muslims - was a dispute in regards to who would take power in order to establish Islam on Earth, and it was not a dispute as to Islam itself and whether it would be the basis of the Muslims’ life instead of something that opposed it!

At the time, there was no foreign power that possessed any bit of truth or that had greater faith in the beliefs that it lived by more than the faith of the believers in the truth that they had adopted and established their lives upon. This was all based on the pattern of Allah and the necessary characteristics which determine whether victory or defeat are granted by Allah before numbers, physical preparation, or war strategies. These things do matter in the end, as they are means that Allah has ordered us to take and has made them a part of His pattern. However, material means alone are not enough and do not determine what happens in the end.

This was also the case with the crisis of the Crusades and crisis of the Tatar invasion - these were very difficult situations in the lives of the Muslims. It seemed at times that the existence of Islam would end and that the Muslims would be wiped off the face of the Earth. However, the actual outcome was otherwise, and victory came from Allah in the end. The defeat came first, victory came in the end, and both were in accordance with the pattern of Allah that nothing in existence can escape. The condition of the Muslims was bad, as they were overcome by sins, innovations, deviations, divisions, and preoccupation with all of this from aiding and establishing the Religion of Allah on Earth. As a result, the armies of the enemy overwhelmed the Muslim lands and took away their power until this very day. However, the essence of ‘aqidah was still ingrained in their hearts even if it was overtaken by laziness, inactivity, and preoccupation with worldly desires.

This was the case until those leaders came along to wake the people up by calling them to the reality of Islam, and this essence was revived and ignited once more, and victory came on its heels. This happened when Salah ad-Din stood and said to his people: “You have been defeated because you are far from the way of Allah, and you will not be victorious until you return to that path,” and when Ibn Taymiyyah called to correcting the beliefs from the corruption and misguidance of the philosophers that had affected them, and when Qutuz stood and made his famous call: “O Islam (wa Islamah)!” And when the masses of the Muslims heeded their calls and were true to Allah in their beliefs and behavior, victory came and the Muslims were able to defeat many times their number of the disbelievers and polytheists.

And the disaster of Andalusia came as a divine punishment to the Muslims for the division and warfare that was taking place between them, as well as their cooperation with their enemies from the Crusaders against their own brethren, as well as their taking these enemies as close allies instead of the believers - in opposition to the command of Allah - while they were not faithful to them. This was all in addition to the worldly desires they were drowning in, both permissible and the prohibited.

Andalusia did not return to the Muslims. But, the zeal of the Muslims as a whole did not die out. At the same time that Islam was under siege in Andalusia, there was another Islamic state being born that was on its way to being established on Earth and that would preserve the existence of the Muslims for an entire four centuries. This state had extended into the heart of the Christian world - even reaching Vienna and Petersburg - and millions of people in Europe and Asia entered Islam because of it.

However, the crisis that afflicts the Muslims today is more difficult and bitter than the crises that came before it.

I do not have any doubt that it will pass like the ones before it, and that Allah will establish His Religion once again on Earth.

However, we must understand the specific nature of this crisis in order to know why it has lasted longer than those that came before it. From another angle, so that we know how to get ourselves out of this problem when Allah makes it possible, and so that we take the proper means to success, with Allah’s permission.

When the first Crusader wars began that lasted nearly a hundred years (1096-1291 CE) - during and after which the Tatar invasions also occurred - the Muslims were preoccupied by innovations, deviations, and sins from the true Islam, and they became lazy and sat back from taking the proper means to attaining their goals. However, Islam itself was never a subject of debate between them - neither the nature of its beliefs nor the nature of its system of governance and life. Even when they were defeated by the Crusaders and the Tatars, their defeat was not because they had any doubt in Islam itself as a belief or way of life, and that they looked with admiration to the beliefs, thoughts, ideas, systems, and behavior of their enemies, or that they thought even for a second that their enemies possessed any element of the truth upon which they based their lives, or that there was anything other than Islam that could be the truth when it comes to ‘aqidah or system of life. And the issue of ruling by what Allah had revealed was not a subject of doubt or debate with them, because it was an inseparable part of their Islam. Rather, they rightly saw it was the main manifestation of their being Muslims.

This is why they never despaired even then they were defeated before their enemies for extended periods of time, and they never felt that they were less than their enemies. Rather, they were a full manifestation of the verse: {“So, do not become weak or sad, and you are superior if you are believers.”} [Al 'Imran; 139]

They were believers!

In fact, even when they were defeated, they looked down upon their enemies because their beliefs and outlook did not conform with the true belief and outlook, and because their character and behavior did not conform with the Islamic character and behavior. In their view, the Tatars were barbarians who had no religion or civilization, and the Crusaders were polytheistic worshipers of the Cross. Above all, they were lacking in manners and had no concern for honor or chastity.

As for the Crusades of our times, the situation is quite different than it was before.

The Muslims became quite deviated from the reality of Islam and its outlook, not just in some manners or behavior here or there:

  • The understanding of ‘there is none worthy of worship but Allah’ - the basis and most significant pillar of Islam - became transformed into a mere word spoken on the tongue with no connection to reality, and having no effect on the lives of the Muslims more than that it is repeated by them several times everyday! This is in addition to the deviations that have afflicted this belief such as the worship of graves, saints, and scholars in place of the pure, sincere worship of Allah without any mediators.
  • The understanding of the concept of worship - the encompassing, vast concept - became restricted to that of mere rituals, and whoever fulfills these rituals has fulfilled all of his obligations of worship, and he has no other requirements or obligations in front of Allah! This is in addition to what has befallen these rituals themselves of complete absence from everyday life, as if it is something with no effect or influence on the life of this world.
  • The understanding of divine predestination - which is considered a motivating force in its true form - became an obsolete force that prevented people from activity, movement, and utilizing material means! This is in addition to the use of magic, etc. that accompanied this in an attempt to run behind the perceived pattern of Allah as opposed to the actual pattern of Allah that He commanded the Muslims to deal with, utilizing the material means that allow them to take advantage of it if they depend on Him as they should, as in the verse: {“…If you give victory to Allah, He will give victory to you…”} [Muhammad; 7] and the hadith: “Use medicine, O slaves of Allah, as Allah has not made a disease except that He has provided medicine for it,” etc.
  • The understand of this life and the Hereafter that ties this life to the next, and places this life as fertile ground for the plants of the next, became one of complete separation between this life and the Hereafter. They are now completely opposing forces, as whoever seeks to excel in this life must abandon the Hereafter, and whoever seeks to succeed in the Hereafter must abandon the life of this world and seek only the minimum in it. As for having influence on Earth, this was ignored when it was decided to ignore this life for the Hereafter. So, the people became overwhelmed with poverty, ignorance, disease, backwardness in civilization, wealth, knowledge, and intelligence. To make matters worse, they saw this all as something preordained by Allah, with no way for them to influence their own fates except with agreement and submission!

In addition to all of this, people’s lives have become devoid of life. Life has simply become empty rituals inherited and preserved as nothing more than rituals, and not as part of a living system of life. Worship is nothing but rituals, manners are nothing but rituals, a woman’s hijab is nothing but a ritual, and chastity is nothing but a ritual instead of being a conscious act of worship of Allah, or part of a complete system of life.

This is the state the Muslims were in when the new Crusades began, and it was expected that they would be destroyed and wiped out!

History contains many heroic instances for the Muslims in fighting against the Crusaders who had invaded the lands of Islam between the 17th and 19th centuries, whether this was in Northern Africa, Central Africa, the Nile Valley (Egypt and Sudan), India, Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines, or in Central Asia that was dominated by the Russian Czarist Crusaders.

However, they were the heroic stances of the defeated one who was in his last moments, making his last moves before his surrender. The concept of ‘aqidah was thrown behind their backs, and it was therefore inevitable that the people would end up in defeat and surrender.

Much can be said about the strange European civilization that the Muslims came into contact with upon their abandonment of their own civilization. This led them to develop an inferiority complex, as well as a fascination with the West’s ideas, systems, and freedom from religion and manners. It is true that there are great differences between the civilizations. However, to say that this is the reason for the inferiority complex and the fascination with the West that afflicted the Muslims, besides the fact that it is besides the point, hides the true causes of this feeling of inferiority just as it hides the true methods of curing this problem.

In their early days, the Muslims were very simple bedouins who had none of the material or scientific advancements that were in the hands of the modernized peoples around them. If they wanted to become materially or scientifically advanced, they had to obtain this from the two great powers on their left and right, Persia and Rome.

They went ahead and did this. However, they never lowered their heads, and they were never impressed. They were always the superior ones because they were believers!

They were in dire need of the knowledge possessed by the disbelieving idolators around them. However, this dire need did not drive them to feel inferior in relation to them, or that they were less than them in any way. Rather, they felt and knew that all honor was with them because honor belongs to Allah, His Messenger, and the believers, and not a single shred of honor belonged to the disbelieving idolators even if they possessed all the knowledge and treasures in the world!

When they obtained what they needed from those around them, their behavior that was elevated by their faith was clear in terms of how to obtain these things, and it was clearest when it came to two things:

First, they could never be defeated by their enemies out of pressure that they needed something from them.

Second, they did not absorb everything they found with their enemies. Rather, they would absorb based on knowledge and insight. They would only keep what they felt they needed and did not contradict their beliefs or Islam, and they would turn away from everything that they saw to be unnecessary or in contradiction to their beliefs and outlook. The best example of this was that while they took some knowledge from the Greeks, they did not record the famous mythologies that were prevalent amongst them because they felt that they contained elements of polytheistic jahiliyyah and were drowning in misguidance, and did not deserve any attention, and instead deserved to be ignored and put aside.

As for the method of obtaining knowledge in the later period, what a difference! The difference had nothing to do with the extent of the divide between the civilizations of those obtaining the knowledge and those providing it as one might conclude was the case with the first deviation that occurred. Rather, it had to do with the position of the two parties in relation to each other in the earlier period of obtaining knowledge as opposed to that of the later period.

In the first period, the Muslims were superior even while they were the ones obtaining the knowledge, and this was because the elevation by faith was what carved out their lives and determined their positions on various issues. In the second period, their beliefs had become rusted and left under the rubble. So, there was no honor or superiority. There was only defeat, disgrace, and taking everything that the West had without any insight or distinction between what was beneficial and what was harmful, what was in agreement with Islam and what opposed it, etc. This was because Islam was no longer the main concern of the “modern Muslim”! It no longer had its unique essence derived from the true beliefs and application of the manhaj of Allah…”

['Waqi'una al-Mu'asir'; p. 7-12]

Study Subjects That Will Change the World

Posted in 'Abdullah 'Azzam on July 2, 2008 by Abu Sabaya

“…Look at these Ba’this. Here is Michel ‘Aflaq (Christian co-founder of the Ba’th Party), who ruled two significant portions of the Arab world. He positioned himself upon the throne of ‘Umar bin ‘Abd al-’Aziz (i.e. Syria), and he now positions himself upon the throne of Harun ar-Rashid (i.e. Iraq).

Michel ‘Aflaq obtained the post of Minister of Education in Syria for a few months - he was just a minister - and he took the Ba’this and sent them to study in La Sorbonne (a university in Paris). What did he send them to study? Philosophy, psychology, history, social sciences, economics, politics - not medicine or engineering - because these are the subjects that change societies, and these are the subjects that change mentalities. As for the professor in the college of engineering, what will he change? He will keep teaching the same theories of engineering. As for history, you can paint it as you wish, and you can distort the events that you want and paint what you wish in a good light (i.e. you can affect what you are teaching).

And they actually did this, and they came back and took over the University of Damascus. They occupied the position of guiding a generation. So, you do not find them directing their little pigs except to study the social sciences, and they never enter the colleges of science. Why not? Because when it comes to the colleges of science, if a Christian studies chemistry, will it change anything? N2 + HCl will always equal N2Cl + H2. Will this formula ever change? It will never change. Hydrogen sulfate with the Ba’this is H2S04, and with the Muslims it is also H2S04. Will they bring about a new law of chemistry? They will not bring about a new law of chemistry.

As for history, building your mind, building your character, look at the Jews. The Jews in America and outside of America occupy positions in Eastern studies, Islamic studies, Arabic language studies, history, economics, etc. You find Henry Kissinger and Safroni - two Jews, and the Jews respect them - if anyone in the world wants to be respected, they say that they studied with Kissinger or Safroni. Many ministers in the Arab world studied under him, yes! In our lands, one by one. Over twenty ministers graduated from the same university, and the Jews sent them back after having wiped out all the Islam that was in their conscience with bleach…they send him back to his country with letters of recommendation from the university and its professors, along with any articles he had written - articles in the Times about economics and the Arab mind - he writes a few articles and becomes a minister in his country!

As for us, we want the Muslim doctor, the Muslim lawyer, the Muslim engineer - what will he do all day behind the bricks, the cement, and the laborers? A laborer who works with cement from dusk till dawn - do you think he will have time to listen to anything you have to say? He is simply looking to put food on the table. He is not in the mood to listen to what you have to say. He is simply looking to put food on the table. You have ruined it for yourself, except if you wish to build houses with Islamic designs. This is another story! If you want to design windows with Islamic designs and to put on them Andalusian embroidery, this is another story. Maybe we can benefit from your embroidery, if Allah Wills! The door is on the right and the exit is on the left…maybe, if Allah Wills, we can benefit from your knowledge!

We would advise our brothers to study Shari’ah, to study literature, to study Arabic literature, to study history…”

['Fi Dhilal Surat at-Tawbah'; p. 317-318]

Thirty Good Deeds Passing Us By

Posted in The Words of the Salaf on June 30, 2008 by Abu Sabaya

From ‘Sahih al-Adab al-Mufrad’ (757):

Abu Hurayrah reported that a man passed by the Messenger of Allah while he was in a gathering, and he said: “as-Salamu ‘alaykum.” So, he said: “Ten good deeds.”

Another man passed by and said: “as-Salamu ‘alaykum wa Rahmatullah.” So, he said: “Twenty good deeds.”

Another man passed by and said: “as-Salamu ‘alaykum wa Rahmatullah wa Barakatuh.” So, he said: “Thirty good deeds.”

So, let us try to obtain the thirty good deeds by making the complete greeting instead of the basic one. Imagine how many hasanat pass us by every time we greet each other, as just two or three extra words will gain us an extra twenty good deeds each time we say them!

And from ‘as-Silsilah as-Sahihah’ (1403): “If a man meets his Muslim brother, he should say: ‘as-Salamu ‘alaykum wa Rahmatullah wa Barakatuh.’”

Time Limit for the ‘Isha’ Prayer

Posted in Original Compilations on June 29, 2008 by Abu Sabaya

There is the opinion deduced from taking the apparent (dhahir) meaning of the hadith about the middle of the night that was held by Ibn Hazm, ash-Shawkani, al-Albani, and others that the permissible time is till the middle of the night, beyond which it is forbidden to delay ‘Isha’.

Consider also what the major scholars of the four madhahib said:

Ibn Qudamah al-Maqdisi (Hambali) said in ‘al-Mughni’:

“What is more befitting - if Allah Wills - is that one does not delay it past the first third of the night. If he delays it past the middle of the night, this is permissible. What is beyond this is allowed only for necessity, and its ruling is the same as praying ‘Asr in the time of necessity (in the last portion of its allotted time)…Beyond this, the time of ‘Isha’ extends till the emergence of the second (true) Fajr.”

al-Kasani (Hanafi) said in ‘Bada’i’ as-Sana’i”:

“As for the last time for ‘Isha’, it is when the true time of Fajr comes in, according to us.”

Muhammad ‘Alish (Maliki) said in ‘Manh al-Jalil’:

“And the preferred time to pray ‘Isha’ ends with the first third of the night.”

an-Nawawi (Shafi’i) said in ‘al-Majmu”:

“What is preferred is to pray by the first third of the night. If this preferred time passes, we are left with the permissible time, which is till the time of the second (true) Fajr. This is the madhhab that has been narrated from ash-Shafi’i, and it is what has been clearcut from our companions, past and present.”

at-Tahawi (Hanafi) said in ‘Mushkil al-Athar’:

“So, the authenticity of these narrations has been established: that the time in which one can pray ‘Isha’ is from when the Sun sets, till the end of the night. However, this is divided into three categories:

a) from when it enters, to the first third of the night, and this is the best time in which to pray it, b) as for what is beyond this - till the middle of the night - this is less preferable than the first choice, and c) as for what is beyond the middle of the night, this is less preferable than the times before it.”

So, the four madhahib interpreted the relevant ahadith to mean that the time in which it is permissible to pray ‘Isha’ is till the time of Fajr, with the strong discouragement from delaying it past the first third of the night, let alone the middle of the night, unless one has a good excuse (such as illness, preoccupation with a task, etc.).

In conclusion, there is a difference of opinion as to whether the time limit is a matter of strict forbiddance, or merely one of preference. In any case, the safest thing to do is to not delay it past the middle of the night, as much as you are able.

And Allah Knows best.